Return to WorkInjury.com Home    

 
                        - Help for the Injured Worker
                                - Resources for the Workers Compensation Professional

< Return to WorkInjury.com Home >
Return to Top


SearchArticles

  GO TO:


    - CASES BY TOPIC

    - INDEX OF CASES

    - FORUMS

    - ARCHIVES

          NEWS

          EDITORIALS



Join WorkInjury.com for Just $9.95!

Unlimited access to all our pages, news, cases and features at a fraction the cost of other sites!

WorkInjury.com

 

Attention:
Applicant Attorneys!

Looking for clients?
- click here -

 

 

2005-2009
↓ Money Tables ↓





↓ Book Favorites ↓

click book for details


AMA 5th Still the Law!
(reduced price)


 

Master the AMA Guides!
(for under $60)


 


 

 


 

Online Legal Research Site!

Federal and state laws, cases, news and tons of other useful legal links. Everything a lawyer needs in a simple, single-page format!

The Law Engine.com

 

 


Archives: Case Headlines

-- Date article was archived is in brackets [ ] --

 

 
 Go to Cases by Topic  

 Go to Alphabetical Case Index  

Rule 8.1115 prohibits citing or relying on any unpublished opinion, except in limited, specified circumstances.
Do not rely on any case description or summary without doing your own research!








 

August 2010

  • [08-02-10] WCAB (en banc):   A.D. Rule 30 and Labor Code Section 4060/2
  • [08-09-10] 9th Cir. CA:   Feds Tackle Out-of-State Employers & California Employment Law
  • [08-09-10] WCAB:   Grip Loss As Basis for PD Under AMA Guides After Almaraz/Guzman

  • [08-09-10] WCAB:   Is a C&R a 'Prior Award' for Purposes of LC 4664 Apportionment?
  • [08-09-10] 2nd Dist. CA:   What Actions Fall Within, and Outside, the Exclusive Remedy Rule
  • [08-09-10] WCAB:   Should Diminished Future Earnings Capacity Issue Await 132a Claim?

  • [08-09-10] CCC Advances:  6 Cases for July
  • [08-09-10] 1st Dist. CA:   Is Terminating TD While Ordering Discogram a Conflict?
  • [08-23-10] WCAB:   When Can Specific Employer Representative Be Barred From Depo?

  • [08-23-10] WCAB:   Can Employer Contest Med Treatment Causation If Not in UR Report?
  • [08-23-10] WCAB:   Can Declaration of Readiness Substitute for Contribution Petition?
  • [08-23-10] WCAB:   If Admitted Injury, How Long to File Lien Claim?

  • [08-23-10] WCAB:   Is QME Psyche Report Relevant to QME Eye Exam?
  • [08-30-10] 2nd Dist. CA:   Is Paid Sick Leave 'Reasonable Accommodation' Under FEHA?
  • [08-30-10] 2nd Dist. CA:   Is New Employer Liable for Honoring Old Non-Compete Clause?

  • [08-30-10] WCAB:   If Bad MPN Notice, How Long Is Appl. Entitled to Self-Procure Med?
  • [08-30-10] WCAB:   Can Applicant Schedule QME After 60-Day Reg Limit?

    July 2010

  • [07-06-10] 2nd Dist. CA:   Can Lien Claimant Sue Atty/Investigator for Abuse of Process?
  • [07-06-10] 5th U.S. Cir.:   Is Undocumented Immigrant Entitled to L&H Benefits?
  • [07-06-10] 2nd Dist. CA:   WC Carrier Sued When Applicant Arrested for 'Stolen' Check

  • [07-06-10] U.S. Supreme:   Atts Allowed in ERISA Cases Even When No Benefits Awarded
  • [07-06-10] 2nd Dist. CA:   'Substituted Service' and Default Judgments
  • [07-12-10] 4th Dist. CA:   Can FEHA Lawsuit Stand If No Interactive Process?

  • [07-12-10] WCAB:   When Is Withrawal of Atty Before Trial 'Unreasonable'?
  • [07-12-10] US Supreme:   Workplace Privacy and Employer-Provided PDA's
  • [07-12-10] WCAB:   NFL Case:  CA WC Benefits for Ohio Player?

  • [07-12-10] 1st Dist. CA:   Grounds for 'Vexatious Litigant' Designation in WC-Related Matters
  • [07-26-10] 2nd Dist. CA:   Court Backs Off on Decision on Ex Parte Communications
  • [07-26-10] 1st Dist. CA:   'Sudden, Extraordinary' for Psyche Exception to 6-Mo. Rule

  • [07-26-10] CA Supreme:   Court Reinstates Case Which May Limit LeBoef Rule
  • [07-26-10] WCAB:   Proper Notice for 'Walk-Through' to Compel Med Exam
  • [07-26-10] WCAB:   When Is Suicide Compensable?

  • [07-26-10] WCAB (en banc):   WPI Impairments:  the Roles of Judges, Raters, Doctors

    June 2010

  • [06-07-10] WCAB:   Does 2-Yr TD Limit Apply to Partial or Out-of-State TD?
  • [06-14-10] WCAB:   Can Carrier Offset TD from Worker's Social Security?
  • [06-14-10] WCAB:   Claiming Duplicate TD Credit Instead of Paying Penalty?

  • [06-14-10] WCAB:   Applicant's C&R Check Sent to Atty's Office and Stolen!
  • [06-14-10] WCAB:   Must Employer Provide Ergonomic Equipment at New Job?
  • [06-14-10] WCAB:   Can Employer-Defendant Be 'Re-Joined' After Recon Deadline?

  • [06-14-10] U.S. District Court:   Gallagher-Bassett Adjusters' Lawsuit Still Alive and Well
  • [06-28-10] 2nd Dist. CA:   Exceptions to Disqualifying QME for Ex Parte Communication
  • [06-28-10] WCAB:   Does 15% PD Increase Apply to Prison Inmates?

  • [06-28-10] 6th Dist. CA:   Guzman Case Taken Under Submission

    May 2010

  • [05-03-10] 1st Dist. CA:   Must Employee Sue for ALL Claims Against Employer at Once?
  • [05-03-10] WCAB:   Can Mileage Allowance Be Used for 'Average Weekly Wage'?
  • [05-03-10] 3rd Dist. CA:   Must Chiro Reimburse Board $72K for Discipline Hearing?

  • [05-03-10] 1st Dist. CA:   Cervantes Procedures Reviewed for Spinal Surgeries
  • [05-03-10] CA Supreme / WCAB:   Decision on Penalties, Atty Fees, Upheld by High Court
  • [05-03-10] CA Supreme:   Review Granted in Duncan Case

  • [05-03-10] WCAB:   Does Self-Procured Order Bar Employer's From MPN Transfer?
  • [05-10-10] WCAB:   Liability for Hardware Removal When Surgery Unnecessary
  • [05-10-10] 1st Dist. CA:   Order Ending Special-Fund Agency Furloughs Remains on Hold

  • [05-10-10] WCAB:   Lien Jurisdiction for Living Expenses of Bankrupt Applicant
  • [05-10-10] WCAB:   Rebutting PDRS Under Ogilvie
  • [05-24-10] WCAB:   If No AME After UR Denial, Is Issue Dead at Expedited Hearing?

  • [05-24-10] WCAB:   When & How to Request Autopsy in WC Case
  • [05-24-10] WCAB:   How Exact Must Employer's Offer of Modified-Work Be?
  • [05-31-10] 5th Dist. CA:   Leaving Job Over Health Danger Fear & Unemployment Benefits

  • [05-31-10] 5th Dist. CA:   TD Award After Termination — WCJ's Authority to Defer PD
  • [05-31-10] CA Supreme:   Can Legal Error by Arbitrator Ever Be Voided By Court?
  • [05-31-10] WCAB:   Can WCJ Develop Applicant's Med Record If Applicant Filed DOR?

  • [05-31-10] WCAB:   Can Applicant Amend for CT Body Parts If Stips Resolve Issue?

    April 2010

  • [04-12-10] 2nd Dist. CA:   Is CIGA Liable for Insolvent Excess Coverage?
  • [04-12-10] 3rd Dist. CA:   Does General Contractor Owe Duty of Care to Sub?
  • [04-12-10] 2nd Dist. CA:   Analyzing the Borello Decision on Ind. Contr.

  • [04-12-10] 6th Dist. CA:   Guzman En Banc Decision Granted Review
  • [04-12-10] 5th Dist. CA:   Can Lawsuit for WC Premiums Be 'Account Stated'?
  • [04-12-10] U.S. District - So. Cal.:   Injured Worker Sues WC Judge in Federal Court

  • [04-26-10] 3rd Dist. CA:   Another Reason Why NOT to Represent Yourself
  • [04-26-10] 2nd Dist. CA:   Can WC Lien Be Divided Between Compensable and Non?
  • [04-26-10] WCAB:   Who Is 'Initial Aggressor' to Defeat WC Benefits?

  • [04-26-10] 1st Dist. CA:   When Is Employer of Ind. Contractor Liable?
  • [04-26-10] 1st Dist. CA:   Furloughs Still On... For Now

    March 2010

  • [03-01-10] CA Supreme:   CIGA Asks to Depublish Case on Hospital's Name Changes
  • [03-01-10] 1st Dist. CA:   Past Drug Use as Evidence in Work Injury Case
  • [03-01-10] 4th Dist. CA:   Does Contradictory Testimony Defeat 'Substantial Evidence'?

  • [03-01-10] 2nd Dist. CA:   Failure to Accommodate Disabled Party in Court
  • [03-01-10] CA Supreme:   Pending Case Could Be THE Apportionment Case
  • [03-01-10] 4th Dist. CA:   Standard of Review for Criminal WC Fraud Conviction

  • [03-08-10] WCAB:   Watch What You Tweet (or Brag About on Facebook)
  • [03-15-10] 3rd Dist. CA:   Non-Participation in Pain Mgt - Enough to Deny Dis. Retiremt?
  • [03-15-10] CA Supreme:   Does 'Kin Care' Apply to Unlimited Sick Leave?

  • [03-15-10] 2nd Dist. CA:   When Is Arb. Agreement Limiting Discovery 'Unconscionable'?
  • [03-29-10] 1st Dist. CA:   Does Amended Complaint for WC Fraud Nullify St./ Limit?
  • [03-29-10] CA Supreme:   Joint / Several Liability for Gen. & Special Employers

  • [03-29-10] WCAB:   Case Clarifies Rx Claims Outside Pharmacy Benefit Networks
  • [03-29-10] WCAB:   Does 15% PD 'Add-On' Apply to 100% Cases?
  • [03-29-10] WCAB:   'Express Agreement' Is Needed to Remove WCAB Med Jurisdiction

  • [03-29-10] 3rd Dist. CA:   Can Stips Based on Unsettled Law Be Set Aside Later?

    February 2010

  • [02-01-10] WCAB:   Defense Firms File for Fees/Sanctions in Premier Liens Case
  • [02-01-10] 6th Dist. CA:   Latest Briefs on COLA Case:  Just Right, Illegal, or Double-Penalty?
  • [02-01-10] U.S. 9th Circuit:   U.S. Life to Pay $500 Mil for Bankrupt Superior National Claims

  • [02-01-10] 4th Dist. CA:   What Are 'Material' Facts for Summary Judgment?
  • [02-01-10] Alameda Superior:   Will New Court Ruling End DIR-DWC Furlough Days?
  • [02-08-10] 5th Dist. CA:   Serious & Willful Misconduct:  How Much 'Fault' Is Needed?

  • [02-08-10] WCAB - Panel:   Decision Defers PD Award Until Ogilvie Decided
  • [02-08-10] U.S. Supreme:   Supremes OK RICO Cases for WC Claim Denials
  • [02-08-10] 5th Dist. CA:   Is Civil Service Hearing 'Res Judicata' for FEHA Claim?

  • [02-08-10] 2nd Dist. CA:   Using Out-of-State Depo in Wrongful Death Case?
  • [02-15-10] CA Supreme:   FEHA Case: 'Big Fees, Small Award' Issue
  • [02-15-10] WCAB:   Lien Claimants Sanctioned for Bad Recon Petitions

  • [02-15-10] WCAB (En Banc):   Two Major Spinal Surgery / UR Issues Finally Resolved
  • [02-15-10] U.S. District Ct.:   No Medicare Set Aside?  Read This!
  • [02-15-10] 4th Dist. CA:   Emplymt Cases:  Shorter St/Limit & 'Admin. Exemption'

  • [02-22-10] 2nd Dist. CA:   Avoiding Exclusive Remedy:  'Fraudulent Concealment'
  • [02-22-10] 6th Dist. CA:   When Does Labor Code Cost-of-Living Increases Start?
  • [02-22-10] 2nd Dist. CA:   'Going & Coming' Rule, Excessive Damages in FELA Cases

  • [02-22-10] 2nd Dist. CA:   Should 'Mixed Motive' Instruction Be Given in Discrim. Case?
  • [02-22-10] 2nd Dist. CA:   How NOT to Write a Firm's Arbitration Agreement

    January 2010

  • [01-11-10] 3rd Dist. CA:   Is '100% Healed' Return-to-Work Policy Discrimination?
  • [01-11-10] 5th Dist. CA:   Is WCAB Remand Order Subject to Writ of Review?
  • [01-11-10] 3rd Dist. CA:   Lousy Brief Causes Appeal to be 'Forfeited'

  • [01-11-10] 6th Dist. CA:   Sub. Inj Fund Requests Rehearing of COLA Increase Case
  • [01-11-10] 4th Dist. CA:   What Is Legally 'Trivial' When Alleging Sexual Harassment?
  • [01-11-10] 1st Dist. CA:   Can Subcontractor Be Liable If Didn't Create Hazard?

  • [01-11-10] 2nd Dist. CA:   Does Privette Preclude Neg. Suit If Dangerous?

    December 2009

  • [12-14-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Is Failing to Return Employee to Work 132a Violation?
  • [12-14-09] WCAB Panel:   Watch How You Witness Your Compromise & Releases!
  • [12-14-09] CA Supreme:   Voc Rehab & Spinal Fusion Equals PD Cases Not Certified

  • [12-14-09] 4th Dist. CA:   Does Carrying Tools for Work Affect 'Going and Coming' Rule?
  • [12-28-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Did Employer Owe State Death Benefits After Paying Estate?
  • [12-28-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Sufficiency of Evidence for Malicious Prosecution by WC Atty

  • [12-28-09] US Supreme:   Can EEOC Issue Subpenas After Right-to-Sue Letters?
  • [12-28-09] 4th Dist. CA:   When Is Obnoxious Workplace Banter Sexual Harassment?
  • [12-28-09] 6th Dist. CA:   Grounds for 'Delisting' Chiropractor From Med Provider's List

  • [12-28-09] CA Supreme:   Last Nail in Coffin for Voc Rehab Cases?
  • [12-28-09] CA Supreme:   Defining 'Reprehensibility' When Determining Punitives
  • [12-28-09] Out of State (Kentucky):   Liability for Strip Search Hoax by 3rd Party?


    November 2009

  • [11-02-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   What's Failure to Engage in Interactive Process?
  • [11-02-09] 5th Dist. CA:   Is CIGA Liable If 'Covered Insured' Morphs Into New Entity?
  • [11-02-09] 1st/3rd Dist. CA:   Spinal Surgery, 'New & Further' Petition Issues Get Reviews

  • [11-09-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   What if Rehab 'Awarded' But on Appeal on 1/09?
  • [11-09-09] 4th Dist. CA:   Sufficiency of Evidence & Jury Instructions in Cop's WC Fraud Case
  • [11-09-09] 9th Circuit:   Can 'Legitimate Personnel Action' Defeat L&H Mental Claim?

  • [11-09-09] 1st Dist. CA:   Court Shocked by Summary Dismissal of Worker's Objections
  • [11-16-09] CA Supreme:   Supreme Court Says No to Half Dozen Workers' Comp Cases
  • [11-16-09] CA Supreme:   Can Unpaid Bonus Be Forfeited Without Violating LC 201/202?

  • [11-23-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Is Employer Liable for Worker Driving Home From Airport?
  • [11-23-09] WCAB:   Many Premier Lienholders Allowed to Pursue Their Liens
  • [11-23-09] Writs Filed in 3 High Profile Cases on Rating Schedule, Voc Rehab

  • [11-23-09] U.S. 9th:   Can Physical Capacity Test Violate ADA?
  • [11-23-09] 4th Dist. CA:   Is Evidence of Accessing Porno at Work Enough for Termination?
  • [11-30-09] 4th Dist. CA:   Tolling of Public Entity S/Limitations, Exclusive Remedy Rule

  • [11-30-09] 4th Dist. CA:   How Far From Doc's Office is 'Reasonable' When Hurt on Route?
  • [11-30-09] 5th/6th Dist. CA:   Separate Petitions Filed in Almaraz/Guzman II Cases
  • [11-30-09] 10th Cir. (Fed):   Poor Syntax in Ins. Policy Excluding Labor Laws Violations

    October 2009

  • [10-12-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Court Tells WCAB to Reexamine Which Rating Manual to Use
  • [10-12-09] 4th Dist. CA:   Court Rules on Workers' Comp Atty's $310K Referral Fee Lawsuit
  • [10-12-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   'Raw Materials' Defense No Bar in Navy Asbestos Case

  • [10-12-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Is Ins. Broker Negligent If No WC Coverage in Business Package?
  • [10-12-09] 1st Dist. CA:   Should Retaliation-Harassment Suit Against DIR Proceed?
  • [10-12-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Is Changing 'Prevailing Party' 'Clerical Error'?

  • [10-12-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Asbestos Case Deals With Strict Liability & / Negl. Evidence
  • [10-12-09] 5th Dist. CA:   'Going/Coming' Rule & Commuting to Work Meeting on Day Off
  • [10-12-09] U.S. 9th Circuit:   What Constitutes "De Minimis' Noncompensable Work Duties?

  • [10-19-09] WCAB:   Ogilvie II:  Unchanged But Clarified
  • [10-19-09] WCAB:   Almaraz/Guzman II:  Stay Within AMA Guides, But...
  • [10-26-09] 4th Dist. CA:   Can Wrongful Termination Suit Be Barred by Anti-SLAPP?

  • [10-26-09] 4th Dist. CA:   Cab Drivers' Class Action Case Now Published Decision
  • [10-26-09] 3rd Dist. CA:   Are Fees 12X Higher Than Wrongful Term. Damages OK?
  • [10-26-09] 3rd Dist. CA:   Can Employer Claim Credit for 3rd-Party Funds From CIGA?

  • [10-26-09] CA Supreme:   High Court Takes a Pass on Published TD Credit Opinion
  • [10-26-09] 1st Dist. CA:   Opinion Affirming Failure to Accommodate Certified

    September 2009

  • [09-08-09] 5th Dist. CA:   Another Court Sides With Benson Decision
  • [09-08-09] 4th Dist. CA:   Does County Have Duty to Disclose Confidential Severance?
  • [09-08-09] CA Supreme:   'Reasonable' Surgery Fees -- Tapia Case Denied Review

  • [09-08-09] CA Supreme:   When Is Employee Video an Invasion of Privacy?
  • [09-08-09] 5th Dist. CA:   Is Post-Injury Policy for Drug Test LC 132a Violation?
  • [09-14-09] 4th Dist. CA:   Grounds for Employee of Independent Contractor Suing General

  • [09-14-09] WCAB (en banc):   Board Rules on Reconsidering Weiner Decision
  • [09-14-09] CA Supreme:   Should Fraud Case Against SCIF Proceed?
  • [09-21-09] 4th Dist. CA:   Evidence Needed to Support Pregnancy Discrimination

  • [09-21-09] 5th Dist. CA:   Can Worker Sue Chemical Supplier for Failure to Warn?
  • [09-21-09] 4th Dist. CA:   When Are Anti-Solicitation Clauses Enforceable?
  • [09-21-09] 4th Dist. CA:   Does Reprimand for Bad Conduct Equal Sexual Harassment?

  • [09-21-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Can Superior Court Be Used to Get Interest for WC Fee?
  • [09-28-09] 1st Dist. CA:   Can Employer Be Liable If Property Owner's Neg. Caused Death?

    August 2009

  • [08-03-09] CAAA Lists 2009's Most Important WC Cases
  • [08-03-09] 'Work-Arounds' to New Benson Rule Discussed
  • [08-10-09] 3rd Dist. CA:   Appellate Court Modifies Sandhagen Decision

  • [08-10-09] 4th Dist. CA:   Supreme Court Test for 'Employee' Same for WC or EDD
  • [08-10-09] 4th Dist. CA:   Can Cab Drivers' 'Employee' Claims Be Class Action?
  • [08-10-09] U.S. District (Tenn.):   "Shy Bladder" - New Possible ADA Violation

  • [08-10-09] 3rd Dist. CA:   Does LC 4062 Estop Party From Seeking Retro TTD?
  • [08-10-09] U.S. Supreme:   Punitives for Failure to Pay Meds In Maritime Case
  • [08-10-09] 4th Dist. CA:   Can WC Filings Be Used for Restraining Order?

  • [08-17-09] 1st Dist. CA:   Can Non-Prosecutor Set Fines If Also Crime?
  • [08-17-09] 6th Dist. CA:   'Knowledge of Disability' for Wrongful Discharge
  • [08-17-09] 6th Dist. CA:   Review Granted in PD/Life Pension Increase Case

  • [08-17-09] 3rd Dist. CA:   Can Wrongful Termination Be Basis for Punitives?
  • [08-17-09] US 9th Circuit:   Does Wal-Mart Have Legal Obligation for Foreign Workers?

  • [08-17-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Attys Fees in Unsuccessful Emplymt Case
  • [08-17-09] Summary of ALL Almaraz/Guzman/Ogilvie Amicus Briefs
  • [08-24-09] 6th Dist. CA:   Getting WC Atty Fees Reimbursed From Armed Robber?

  • [08-24-09] 4th Dist. CA:   Is FEHA S/L Tolled for Union Grievance?
  • [08-31-09] 6th Dist. CA:   Couple Accuses Prosecution in WC Fraud Case of Conflict
  • [08-31-09] 1st Dist. CA:   Check List:  What WON'T Work in Employee Arbitration Agreement

  • [08-31-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   When Does Exclusive Remedy Bar 3rd-Party Admin. Suit?
  • [08-31-09] 1st Dist. CA:   How Long Does Party Have to Object to FEHA Settlement?
  • [08-31-09] 2nd Dist. CA: Proving 'Special Employee' Status From Interrogs

  • [08-31-09] U.S. District, FL:   Is Wearing Nose Ring for Religion a Title VII Violation?

    July 2009

  • [07-06-09] 4th Dist. CA:   Only Civil Action Possible for Unlicensed Laborer w/o Min Hrs
  • [07-06-09] 4th Dist. CA:   Court Reverses Starbucks Ruling on Tip Sharing
  • [07-06-09] US Supreme:   Pregnancy Discrimination Act Not Retroactive

  • [07-06-09] U.S. District (LA):   Is Voice Recognition Software ADA-Mandated for Carpel Tunnel?
  • [07-06-09] CA Supreme:   Court Refuses to Publish Grimaldo Decision
  • [07-06-09] CA Supreme:   Benson Denied Review by Supreme Court

  • [07-20-09] CA Supreme:   Ct. Nixes Attys Fees for Informal Med Treatment Denials
  • [07-20-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Must State Farm Pay Domestic's False Imprisonmt Damages?
  • [07-20-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Final Death Rattle for Wilkinson Rule?

  • [07-20-09] WCAB - Panel:   EAMS Foul-Up Results in Voided Decision
  • [07-20-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Can 3rd Party Sue Employer for Overworked Employee?
  • [07-27-09] U.S. Supreme:   Age Discrimination Rules Tightened

  • [07-27-09] 6th Dist. CA:   Court of Appeal Denies Review in Guzman Case... for Now
  • [07-27-09] WCAB (En Banc):   Rest in Peace Vocational Rehabilitation... Maybe
  • [07-27-09] 5th Dist. CA:   Do Labor Code Provisions Apply to Public Entities?

  • [07-27-09] 5th Dist. CA:   Is Supervisor's Handling of Complaint Civil Negligence?
  • [07-27-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Can Unlicensed Contractor Sue Homeowner As 'Non-Employee'?
  • [07-27-09] CA Supreme:   No Review of 'No Apportionment' Reversal

  • [07-27-09] SF Superior:   Stay Lifted, 500 SCIF Workers Avoid Furloughs

    June 2009

  • [06-01-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Checking Conf. Statement Boxes Enough for 15% PD Increase?
  • [06-01-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Entire Med Record Determines Which Rating Schedule to Use
  • [06-01-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Is Private Marina Exempt from the ADA?

  • [06-01-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Does Employer's Indemnity Clause w/ 3rd Party Give Right to Sue?
  • [06-01-09] CA Supreme:   Supremes to Review Tip Pooling Case After Appellate Splits
  • [06-01-09] 4th Dist. CA:   No Malpractice When Atty Didn't Seek Late Filing Relief

  • [06-01-09] 4th Dist. CA:   When Only Evidence Says Apport. Can WCJ Find NONE?
  • [06-01-09] 4th Dist. CA:   Is Failure to Provide Sales Materials Actionable Per LC 970?
  • [06-01-09] 4th Dist. CA:   HIV-Positive Plaintiff Failed to State Valid FEHA Claims

  • [06-01-09] 4th Dist. CA:   SCIF Has Disclosure Duty of Premium Facts Before Issuing Policy
  • [06-15-09] WCAB:   Insurance Dept. Files Briefs in Ogilvie, Almaraz Cases
  • [06-15-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Burden on Employee in FEHA Case to Show He Can Work

  • [06-15-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Can DFEH Be Sued Directly for 'Failing to Enforce Its Laws'
  • [06-15-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   What Is "Occurrence" in Self-Insured Excess Ins. Policy
  • [06-22-09] 3rd Dist. CA:   Firing of Mgr Mixing Biz With Pleasure Withstands Sum. Judgment

  • [06-29-09] CA Supreme:   Supremes Revive Big Tobacco Lawsuit & Clarify Class Actions
  • [06-29-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   "Me Too" Evidence Admissible in Discrimination Claim
  • [06-29-09] 1st Dist. CA:   Can an Inmate Sue Prison Doctor for Malpractice?

  • [06-29-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Can Filing WC Claim Equitably Toll PI Statute of Limitations?
  • [06-29-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Tapia Decision on Outpatient Provider Fees Withstands Appeal
  • [06-29-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Suit Against CIGA Revived as Court Explains Appeal Time

  • [06-29-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Court Grants Review of WCAB's Decision Denying Employer Credit

     

    May 2009

  • [05-04-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   What Is a 'Qualified Individual' for an FEHA Discrimination Claim?
  • [05-04-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Arbitration Barring Class Action Invalid
  • [05-04-09] 1st Dist. CA:   Court Simplifies Ogilvie Appeal Process, Denies Writ... For Now

  • [05-04-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Certified Case Shows When an Arbitration Agreement IS OK
  • [05-11-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Work Injury 'Lighting Up' Diabetes Case Gets 2nd Chance
  • [05-11-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Health Plan Admin. Owes Duties to Members When Denying Claim

  • [05-11-09] 1st Dist. CA:   Court Rejects Boughner Review (New PDRS Lawful)
  • [05-11-09] 4th Dist. CA:   No Duty Owed by Former Employer in Negligent Hiring Action
  • [05-11-09] 5th Dist. CA:   When Can Judge Overrule Jury on Credibility Issue in FEHA Case?

  • [05-11-09] 1st Dist. CA:   Can Employer Sue Credit-Card Co. for Ok'ing Employee-Embezzler?
  • [05-18-09] 3rd Dist. CA:   Appeals Court to Decide Basic Issues of 'Serious' and 'Willful'
  • [05-18-09] WCAB:   Board Orders Rehearings in Ogilvie and Almaraz/Guzman

  • [05-18-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Can Cop Sue City for Privacy Invasion for Using Wiretap?
  • [05-18-09] CA Supreme:   Supremes Grant Review of Apportionment Case (Hertz/Aguilar)
  • [05-18-09] WCAB:   Board Gives 1/1/09 Voc Rehab Case 'En Banc' Status

     

    April 2009

  • [04-06-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Newly Published Decision Further Clarifies Legality of Tip-Pooling
  • [04-06-09] Superior Ct:   Jury Clears SCIF of Unfair Dealing Against Brokers
  • [04-06-09] 1st Dist. CA:   Benson Decision Buries Wilkinson Apportionment Rule

  • [04-06-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Change of Mind on 'Unconscionability' of Arbitration Class Waiver
  • [04-13-09] WCAB (en banc):   AMA Guides Rebuttable Thru Med Opinion
  • [04-13-09] WCAB (en banc):   Diminished Future Earning Capacity Tables Rebuttable

  • [04-13-09] Defense Firm Announces Writ Filed in Almaraz/Guzman Cases
  • [04-13-09] 1st Dist. CA:   3rd-Party Admin. Owes Duty to Excess Insurer in WC Claim
  • [04-13-09] 6th Dist. CA:   Guzman Writ Petition Now Available Here

  • [04-13-09] 1st Dist. CA:   Is Hotel's 'Business Manager' Exempt From LC Overtime Provisions?
  • [04-13-09] CA Supreme:   Burden Eased for Whistleblowers Getting to Court
  • [04-13-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Failure to Name Owners in FEHA Claim Bars Inclusion in Civil Case

  • [04-20-09] 4th Dist. CA:   Does Motor Carrier Exemption Preclude Overtime Wage Laws?
  • [04-20-09] 1st Dist. CA:   Workers Comp Evidence OK'd as Proof in Civil Harassment Case
  • [04-20-09] 1st Dist. CA:   Does a Subcontractor Owe a Duty to His Foreman?

  • [04-20-09] 9th U.S.C.A.:   Big Crowd for En Banc Arguments in Wal-Mart Gender Class Case
  • [04-20-09] 5th Dist. CA:   No Invasion of Privacy for Using MySpace Material Outside Website
  • [04-27-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Can Arbitration Terms Waive Class Actions & Private Atty General?

  • [04-27-09] 1st Dist. CA:   2 Published Opinions Split on Private Right to Sue for Tips
  • [04-27-09] 5th Dist. CA:   Is Injury Compensable While Retrieving Personally-Bought Item?

     

    March 2009

  • [03-02-09] 5th Dist. CA/5:   TD Due If 'Retiring' Because of Injury
  • [03-02-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Adding Multiplier to Attys Fees OK in FEHA Case
  • [03-02-09] 5th Dist. CA:   Stips Waived Requested Med Treatment, Supported by Evidence

  • [03-02-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Instruct on Negligence Per Se When Building Code Violations
  • [03-09-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   New PD Award OK'd More Than 5 Yrs From Injury
  • [03-09-09] 5th Dist. CA:   No Apportionment for ANY DOI's for Safety Worker's Presumptions

  • [03-09-09] 3rd Dist. CA:   CIGA Not Immune From Post-Judgment Interest
  • [03-09-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Failure to Attend Depo, Follow Court Orders, Grounds for Dismissal
  • [03-16-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Can Atty Be Removed for Speaking Directly With a Worker?

  • [03-16-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Forcing Employee to Retire Presents Triable FEHA Issues
  • [03-16-09] 1st Dist. CA:   Defective Products of Third Parties:  Is There a Duty to Warn?
  • [03-16-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Will Second District Follow Benson on Rating Multiple Injuries?

  • [03-16-09] U.S. 9th:   Court Withdraws Wage/Hour Decision, Sends It to Supremes
  • [03-16-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Worker Negl. Retention, Verbal Assaults OUTSIDE Excl. Remedy Rule
  • [03-16-09] 4th Dist. CA:   Court Certifies Decision on Delivery Drivers As Ind. Contractors

  • [03-23-09] Supr. Ct:   Employee CAN Be Fired For Refusing to Incriminate Himself
  • [03-23-09] 6th Dist. CA:   Employer-Paid Landlord Who Kicks Out Tenant Can Be Sued
  • [03-23-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Is Nolo Plea to Misd. Drug Charge a 'Conviction' Under Ed. Code?

  • [03-23-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Can a WC Claim 'Equitably Estop' Govt Claim Stat. of Limitations?
  • [03-23-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   FEHA Trial Strategy Precludes "Exhaustion of Remedies" Defense
  • [03-23-09] 4th Dist. CA:   Does Labor Code Permit Settlement of Overtime Wage Claims?

  • [03-23-09] 5th Dist. CA:   Case Published on Anti-SLAPP Statute & Retaliatory FEHA Claim
  • [03-30-09] US Sup:   Supremes Protect Witnesses in Title VII Harassment Suits
  • [03-30-09] 6th Dist. CA:   NOT Demoting Dishonest Sheriff Supervisor -- Abuse of Discretion?

  • [03-30-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Is Lawyer's Tardiness 'Misconduct' for Unemployment Benefits?
  • [03-30-09] 4th Dist. CA:   Appellate Folly:  Atty Fee on Contempt Case Denied as 'Miscarriage'

     

    February 2009

  • [02-02-09] 1st Dist. CA:   Knee Injury Not Accommodated, FEHA Violation Found
  • [02-02-09] 5th Dist. CA:   Arbitrator's 'Make Whole' Award Defective But Not Fatal
  • [02-02-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Limo Drivers' Class Action De-Certification Reversed

  • [02-02-09] CA/2:   Privacy & Disclosing Employees in Class Action Discovery
  • [02-16-09] CA/6:   What Impact Will "Aguilar Factor" Have??
  • [02-16-09] CA/3:   Death Benefits Reversed When Causation Only 'Possible'

  • [02-16-09] 5th Dist. CA:   Different Interpretations of Same PD Evidence by Panel & WCJ OK
  • [02-16-09] CA/5:   Apportioning 60-Yr-Old Arthritis Not Age Discrim.
  • [02-16-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Sex Complaint to Employer May Be Anti-SLAPP 'Protected Activity'

  • [02-16-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   WC Finding Collaterally Estops Worker in Breach of Contract Action
  • [02-16-09] 3rd Dist. CA:   Going/Coming Rule Exceptions Reviewed, No Vicarious Liability
  • [02-16-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   'Tip Pooling' & Labor Code Section 351

  • [02-23-09] 4th Dist. CA:   School District Can't Deduct Both Vacation & Differential Leave
  • [02-23-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   License Suspension Automatic If No WC Coverage
  • [02-23-09] 3rd Dist. CA:   No Personal Jurisdiction Over Parent Corp in FEHA Action

  • [02-23-09] 1st Dist. CA:   Different Deadlines Apply for Late Wages Penalties
  • [02-23-09] CA Sup Ct:   No Automatic Right to New Trial in MFAA Fee Arbitration
  • [02-23-09] 4th Dist. CA:   Delivery Workers Ruled 'Ind. Contractors'



     

    January 2009

  • [01-05-09] 6th Dist. CA:   LeBoeuf 100% Award Limited If Language Problems
  • [01-05-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Fired Police Officer's Claim That City Blew Deadline Denied
  • [01-05-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Fed Civil Rights Action Tolls Wrongful Termination Deadline

  • [01-05-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Defense Awarded $1 Atty Fee Despite Frivolous FEHA Case
  • [01-05-09] 4th Dist. CA:   No Marital Privilege in Cop's Disciplinary Proceeding
  • [01-05-09] 6th Dist. CA:   Court Reverses Costco Judgment for Overtime Bonuses

  • [01-19-09] 3rd Dist. CA:   No Fee Restitution Despite Applicant's Fraudulent Claim
  • [01-19-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Anti-SLAPP Suit:  Was Atty's Firing Strategy or Pay Back?
  • [01-19-09] 1st Dist. CA:   No Wage Credit Against VRMA Benefits

  • [01-19-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Failure to Post Employee Notices Tolls S/L (Sometimes)
  • [01-19-09] 1st Dist. CA:   No Public Entity Immunity in FEHA Age Discrimination Claim
  • [01-19-09] 3rd Dist. CA:   Cop's Litigation Deemed Rejection of Return to Work Offer

  • [01-19-09] 4th Dist. CA::   Can Doctor's Appt. Book Be Discovered?
  • [01-26-09] 2nd Dist. CA:   Review Granted in Case of Work Injury Triggering Diabetes
  • [01-26-09] 1st Dist. CA, 2nd Dist. CA:   Two Appeals Courts Re-Visit Benson Decision

  • [01-26-09] 4th Dist. CA:   Are Delayed Accommodations an FEHA Violation?
  • [01-26-09] 3rd Dist. CA:   No LC 5813 Sanctions for UEF
  • [01-26-09] Sup.Ct:   Supremes Nix Emergency 'Balance Billing' for HMO's

  • [01-26-09] 4th Dist. CA:   Does New Fed Law Bar Claim for Past State Labor Violation?

     




     
    Past Years (2004 - 2008)
     


    August 2004

    -- IF CASE LINK DOESN'T WORK --

  • [08/20/04] Christmas in July for CIGA!   2 Back-to-Back Rulings
  • [08/20/04] ACOEM TRUMPs Treating Doc / Neuro If No Scientific Evidence

    September 2004

    -- IF CASE LINK DOESN'T WORK --

  • [09/13/04] Supreme Court: C&R Doesn't Settle Civil Claims!
  • [09/30/04] WCAB Defines LC 4650d Benefits as "Penalty"

    October 2004

    -- IF CASE LINK DOESN'T WORK --

  • [10/11/04] New Case on Apportioning Prior Awards Before SB 899
  • [10/12/04] En Banc Case Clarifies Unrepped Worker's Treatment Rights
  • [10/15/04] New Case: Old Law Governs Rehab Appeal if Pre-04 Injury

  • [10/21/04] New En Banc Scheftner Case May Not Be Over!
  • [10/22/04] High Court Sends Back WCAB Case Re VR Deadline
  • [10/25/04] Temp. Agency Appealing 2nd CA Ruling Re CIGA

    November 2004

    -- IF CASE LINK DOESN'T WORK --

  • [11/05/04] New CIGA Case Sent Back to Court of Appeal
  • [11/05/04] 2nd Dist. CA Affirms Ruling on Temp-Agencies & CIGA
  • [11/05/04] 2nd CA Rules General's Insurer Not Liable to Sub's

  • [11/05/04] Interesting WC Cases Pending
  • [11/05/04] Reviewing US & Cal Supreme Ct. WC Cases in 2004 & 2005
  • [11/23/04] Primary/Secondary Coverage Under Ins. Code Irrelevant

  • [11/23/04] Supreme Court Reaffirms Who Interprets Laws

  • [11/29/04]   CAAA Lawsuit Attacking MPN Regulations
                  - CAAA's Lawsuit Dismissed, Court Says No "Aggrieved" Party!
                  - Read the Full CAAA Complaint Attacking MPN Regs!
                  - The Insurance Industry Responds to CAAA's Lawsuit
                  - More Articles & Comments About CAAA's Lawsuit

    December 2004

    -- IF CASE LINK DOESN'T WORK --

  • [12/09/04] 2nd District CA Grants Rehearing in RemedyTemp/CIGA Case
  • [12/09/04] New Unpublished Case: TTD Still Due for Retiree
  • [12/14/04] Florida Supremes Say Bye to Workers' Comp. Rules

  • [12/20/04] Oakland Judge Rules on Apportionment
  • [12/20/04] Exclusive: Beware of Sandhagen v. SCIF (by Cliff Levy)
  • [12/20/04] En Banc Decision Clarifies SB 899's Retroactivity!

  • [12/27/04] CA Rules Employee Who May Make Complaint Can't Be Fired

    January 2005

    -- IF CASE LINK DOESN'T WORK --

  • [01/24/05] US Supreme Ct. Validates Berkeley "Living Wage" Law (Sort of)
  • [01/24/05] Landlord Liable for Tenant's Employee's WC Injuries
  • [01/24/05] Court Rules in Favor of Dept. of Insurance & Against SCIF

    February 2005

    -- IF CASE LINK DOESN'T WORK --

  • [02/07/05] Supreme Ct. Rules PI Atty Fees Part of Injured's Income
  • [02/07/05] Lawsuit Filed Regarding New P.D. Schedule!
  • [02/07/05] Court Ruling on Penalties Affecting Injured Worker's Widow

  • [02/17/05] Second District CA Expands Cancer Presumption
  • [02/17/05] Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Campbell Case
  • [02/17/05] WCAB Says "Cure and Relieve" Means "Cure OR Relieve"

  • [02/17/05] WCAB: Penalty Statute Retroactive, New Statute of Limitations
  • [02/17/05] En Banc Decision on Utilization Review Guidelines (Sandhagen)
  • [02/22/05] Supreme Court Asked to Define "At Will" Termination

    March 2005

    -- IF CASE LINK DOESN'T WORK --

  • [03/07/05] WCAB: New Apportionment Doesn't Change AOE/COE Laws
  • [03/07/05] Supreme Court Clarifies When 90-Day Denial Period Starts
  • [03/07/05] New Sandhagen Case: UR Not Mandatory for LC 4062

  • [03/07/05] 2nd CA: No WCAB Exclusive Jurisdiction in Uninsured Case
  • [03/07/05] Old Labor Code Section 4062 Applies to pre-2005 Cases
  • [03/07/05] WCAB: New Apportionment Doesn't Change AOE/COE Laws

  • [03/07/05] Supreme Court Clarifies When 90-Day Denial Period Starts
  • [03/07/05] New Sandhagen Case: UR Not Mandatory for LC 4062
  • [03/07/05] 2nd CA: No WCAB Exclusive Jurisdiction in Uninsured Case

  • [03/07/05] Old Labor Code Section 4062 Applies to pre-2005 Cases
  • [03/07/05] All Apportionment Under SB 899 RETROACTIVE
  • [03/08/05] 5th DCA Rejects Widow's Appeal under L.C. 5502

  • [03/08/05] DWC Responds to CAAA's P.D. Lawsuit
  • [03/16/05] CA 5th: L.C. 132a NOT Available for Former Employees
  • [03/18/05] Golden Eagle Not Required to Defend Employer

  • [03/21/05] Court of Appeal Publishes Retroactive Apportionment Ruling
  • [03/21/05] Court Declines to Broaden 5-Year Statute to Re-Open
  • [03/21/05] Court Rejects State Fund's PEO Underwriting Policy

  • [03/28/05] Court Rejects Governor's Order Requiring In-Office State Work
  • [03/28/05] Sandhagen Case Will Not Die

    April 2005

    -- IF CASE LINK DOESN'T WORK --

  • [04/04/05] Ct. of Appeal Rejects WCAB's Attempt to "Regulate" UEF
  • [04/04/05] Firing Perceived Alcoholic Worker Violates ADA
  • [04/18/05] Special: Newest PD Rate Lawsuit Thrown Out Again??

  • [04/25/05] Writs Granted in Cases Involving Illegal Immigrant Workers
  • [04/25/05] 2nd CA Explains "Covered Claim" for CIGA, Annuls WCAB
  • [04/25/05] Supreme Ct. Rules Age Discrim. Needn't Be Intentional

  • [04/25/05] New Fed Case Impacts Depo Questions on Immigration Status
  • [04/25/05] WCAB Apportionment Decision a Blessing for Employers
  • [04/25/05] No CIGA Reimbursement to Carrier Even If "Joint & Several"

    May 2005 - August 2006

    -- IF CASE LINK DOESN'T WORK --

  • [08/30/06] Treating Doctor Presumption Gone For ALL Injury Dates
  • [08/30/06] Already-Awarded WC Benefits Unaffected in New Asbestos Bill

    September 2006

    -- IF CASE LINK DOESN'T WORK --

  • [09/21/06] Read Escobedo En Banc Apportionment Case
  • [09/21/06] New Late Penalty Law Applicable to ALL Cases as of 6/1/04
  • [09/21/06] Court Allows Voc. Rehab Issue AFTER 5 Years!

  • [09/21/06] Ct./Appeal Rules No Malicious Prosecution for Filing 132a

    October 2006

    -- IF CASE LINK DOESN'T WORK --

  • [10/09/06] CA/ Rules Conflicting Med Reports Rarely Appealable
  • [10/09/06] Opinion Certified Nixing Credit Against Voc. Rehab. Benefits
  • [10/09/06] LC 4650 Penalties Not Based on "Unreasonableness"

  • [10/09/06] WCAB Panel Specifies Criteria for Spinal Surgery Objections
  • [10/09/06] LC 4664's Presumption of Lifetime PD is Conclusive
  • [10/16/06] Verdict Still Out Whether Supremes Will Review Chatham

  • [10/23/06] WCAB to Ct Administrator: "Can't Unring Bias Bell!"
  • [10/23/06] New AOE/COE Issues Require LC 4062.2 Rules, Not 4064(d)
  • [10/23/06] Brodie Case Sets Stage for Sup. Ct. Apportionment Showdown

  • [10/30/06] CA/: Correctional Officer NOT 'Peace Officer' When Off Duty

    November 2006

    -- IF CASE LINK DOESN'T WORK --

  • [11/06/06] Fraudulent Concealment Still Trumps Excl. Remedy Rule!
  • [11/06/06] Brodie Case Filed With Supreme Court
  • [11/06/06] Supremes Reject Review of Sierra Pacific Case

  • [11/13/06] CA/ Rules "County," Not Distance, Decides Venue
  • [11/13/06] VR Late Penalty When Defense Renegs on QRR

    December 2006

    -- IF CASE LINK DOESN'T WORK --

  • [12/04/06] Does Vacation Time, Not Sick Leave, for WC Eval = 132a?
  • [12/04/06] Claims Adjusters Exempt From Federal Overtime Rules
  • [12/04/06] Court Permits VR Request Beyond 5 Years, Sometimes

  • [12/04/06] WCAB Spells Out Proper Notice Required for MPN's
  • [12/04/06] Safety Officers Exempt from Apport. Rules
  • [12/11/06] Does 1st Amend. Trump Workers' Comp at Church?

  • [12/11/06] Exclusive Remedy Rule Trumps Strict Liability Law!
  • [12/18/06] Court Says 'Aging' Apportionment May Be Speculative
  • [12/18/06] Is Injury at Employer-Provided Rental Compensable?

  • [12/18/06] Is Employer Liable for Bad Surgery Approved By Mistake?
  • [12/18/06] Can Def. Recover Harassment Pay-Out From Employee?
  • [12/18/06] Latest WCAB Venue Case Certified for Publication

  • [12/31/06] Court Kills WC Dependant Death Benefits
  • [12/31/06] Finally... Published Decision on Apportionment Formula!!
  • [12/31/06] Appeals Ct. Reaffirms Apportionment Law's Retroactivity

  • [12/31/06] Ct. Rules Whether Circumstances Permit TD After 5 Years
  • [12/31/06] Court Finds No Tort Liability Against 3rd Party Landlord
  • [12/31/06] CA/ Rules Whether WC Claim Tolls P.I. St/Limitations

  • [12/31/06] What's "ExtraOrdinary" For 6-Month Psyche Exception?
  • [12/31/06] Out-of-State Court Limits Commercial Travelers Rule
  • [12/31/06] Court of Appeal Rules on Utilization Review Deadlines

  • [12/31/06] Appeals Ct. Rules on Knowledge vs. Disability CT Claims
  • [12/31/06] WCAB Orders Halts to Apportionment Case Reviews

    Janaury 2007

    -- IF CASE LINK DOESN'T WORK --

  • [01/15/07] App. Ct. Finds New Winner for Most Merit-less Appeal
  • [01/15/07] Recent Apportionment Decision Certified for Publication  
  • [01/15/07] Supremes Grant Hearing on Apportionment Cases

  • [01/15/07] Court Defines Seasonal Employee's Rights to TD
  • [01/15/07] Another App. Ct. Takes Sides on Apportionmt Formula
  • [01/29/07] Ct. Explains Why Claim Not Barred 3 Years After Quitting

  • [01/29/07] En Banc Decision on PDRS Retroactivity Under Review
  • [01/29/07] CA/ Upholds New Ruling on Psyche 'Extraordinary Event'

  • [01/29/07] Good News / Bad News in PDRS En Banc Decision

    February 2007

    -- IF CASE LINK DOESN'T WORK --

  • [02/05/07] CA/ Reaffirms Exclusive Remedy in 'Contract' Lawsuit
  • [02/05/07] Another Apportionment Case Reaches High Court
  • [02/05/07] WCAB Defers Attorneys Fees in Apportionment Cases

  • [02/05/07] 1st District Rules 'Single-Sentence' "Report" No Good
  • [02/05/07] CA/ Decides If 'New & Further' Applies to Known Injury
  • [02/05/07] Out-of-State Sup. Ct. Questions No-Fault WC Concept

  • [02/19/07] Ct. Rules Pain Complaint Sufficient "Notice of Injury"
  • [02/19/07] CA/ Defines What's Not a Power Press
  • [02/19/07] Is It an ADA Violation If Light Duty Not Offered?

  • [02/26/07] Time to Recon Amended Award Now Published
  • [02/26/07] CA/ Rules If Recon Petition Timely for Amended Award

    March 2007

    -- IF CASE LINK DOESN'T WORK --

  • [03/05/07] Blanket "PD-Probable" Report Case Certified
  • [03/05/07] CA/: Informal Doctor Inquiry Not Sufficient for AOE/COE
  • [03/05/07] Supreme Court Agrees to Expedite Brodie Cases

    April 2007

    -- IF CASE LINK DOESN'T WORK --

  • [04/09/07] Attorneys Who Will Argue Brodie Cases Named
  • [04/09/07] Read U.S. Court Decision on Labor Law and Indian Tribes  
  • [04/09/07] 5th CA/ Parts With 4th on Apportionment Issue

  • [04/09/07] Does $80K/Yr Atty Serving as a Juror Get Minimum TD?
  • [04/09/07] Appeals Ct. Explains When House Worker Is 'Employee'
  • [04/09/07] 1st District CA/ to Review Baglioni En Banc Issue

  • [04/09/07] Supremes Take Another Apportionment Case, Join 2 Others
  • [04/09/07] As Oral Arguments Approach, Brodie Briefs Mount
  • [04/09/07] Appellate Ct. Rules HOA & Property Mgr Are Dual Employers

  • [04/09/07] Supreme Court Sets Brodie-Welcher Cases for April
  • [04/09/07] Supreme Court Accepts Eighth Apportionment Case
  • [04/09/07] Appeals Ct. Slams Wal-Mart for Not Understanding WC Law

  • [04/16/07] Min. Wage Law Not Precluded by Immigration Laws
  • [04/16/07] Court Remands Recon Petition Filed in Wrong Department
  • [04/16/07] Another Appellate Court Discusses When Old Ratings Apply

  • [04/16/07] En Banc: [REVERSED] Using Old PDRS
  • [04/16/07] En Banc: What in Med-Legal Report Triggers Old PDRS? [REVERSED]
  • [04/23/07] Joint HOA and Property Mgr Liability Case Certified

  • [04/23/07] 3 Cases Get Appellate Review on Which PDRS To Use
  • [04/23/07] Questionable Procedures Lead CA/ to Reopen WC Settlement
  • [04/23/07] Court Upholds 'Substantial Evidence' for Non-Industrial Suicide

  • [04/30/07] Read Latest Briefs on Appeal for New WC Fee Agreements

    May 2007

    -- IF CASE LINK DOESN'T WORK --

  • [05/07/07] Major Change in Attys Fees Ordered for Med Denials
  • [05/14/07] 5th Dist. Explains "Going-Coming" Exceptions in Death Case
  • [05/14/07] Ct. Rules Whether WCJ Can Raise Presumption, Disregard Stips

  • [05/14/07] Supreme Court Gives Employees More Time to Sue for Meal Breaks
  • [05/21/07] Employee Not Barred From 3rd Party Suit If Employer Settles
  • [05/21/07] 5th CA/ Rules Rehab Expert Not Conclusive on 100% PD Issue

  • [05/28/07] More on What's 'Extraordinary' for 6-Month Psyche Exception
  • [05/28/07] Court Rules on Using Vacation Time for WC Doctor Visits
  • [05/28/07] En Banc: Applicable Injury and Award Dates for MPN's

  • [05/28/07] Appeals Court Hears Issues From 2 Controversial En Banc Cases
  • [05/28/07] En Banc Reversal #1:   TD and the Old PDRS (Pendergrass)
  • [05/28/07] En Banc Reversal #2:   Medical Reports and the Old PDRS (Baglioni)

    June 2007

    -- IF CASE LINK DOESN'T WORK --

  • [06/04/07] Court Rules on Delayed 'Expedited' Hearing & Due Process
  • [06/04/07] Who Has Burden of Proof in FEHA Discrimination Case?
  • [06/04/07] Court Rules on Rights to Employer's U.M. Coverage After C&R

  • [06/04/07] Expect Supreme Court to Rule on Old vs. New PDRS Issues
  • [06/04/07] Ct. Finds Not Every Post-Injury Job Change is FEHA Violation
  • [06/04/07] WCJ Invalidates New Rating Schedule as Arbitrary!

  • [06/11/07] Is Carrier's Managing Agent Liable for Non-Issuance of WC Policy?
  • [06/11/07] Attys Fees Awarded for Appeal If Competent Med Report Exists
  • [06/11/07] Ct. Rules on Off-Duty Injury for 'Mounted' Deputy Caring for Horse

  • [06/11/07] Ct. Explains Serious & Willful vs. Negligence
  • [06/18/07] 2nd Dist. CA:  3rd-Party 'Integration' Clause & Exclus. Remedy Rule
  • [06/18/07] 4th Dist. CA:  Med Evidence in Service-Connected Retirement Claim

  • [06/18/07] WCAB:  Retiring WCJ Issues Sweeping Ruling on Out-Patient Liens
  • [06/18/07] 4th Dist. CA:  SCIF Returned to Court on Brokers' Unfair Practices Claims
  • [06/18/07] 1st Dist. CA:  Briefs Filed on Excluding Doctors From MPN's

  • [06/18/07] WCAB:  Defense Rips Former S.D. WCJ's Ethics & Competence
  • [06/18/07] CA Supr:  Reviewing Case Re Attys' Fees & Post-Award Med Denials
  • [06/18/07] 3rd Dist. CA:  Opinion on Suing Employer for "Public Policy" Violation

  • [06/25/07] CA Supr.:  Review Granted of Sandhagen Cases
  • [06/25/07] CA/ 4:  Request Made to Certify SCIF vs. Brokers Opinion
  • [06/25/07] 1st Dist. CA  Costco Opinion Modified to Spell Out When to Use Old PDRS

    July 2007

    -- IF CASE LINK DOESN'T WORK --

  • [07/02/07] US Supr.Read Opinion Limiting Title VII Job Discrimination
  • [07/02/07] 3rd Dist. CA:  Are Apportionment Rules Age-Gender Discriminatory?
  • [07/09/07] 1st Dist. CA:  Which PDRS When TD Paid in 2004 & 2005?

  • [07/09/07] U.S.9:   Does L&H Cover Photographer Taking Ship Tourist Photos?
  • [07/09/07] CA Supr.Ct. Rejects Attack on SB 899 Apportionment
  • [07/16/07] 1st Dist. CA:  Using Exclusive Remedy Rule's 'Aggression' Exception

  • [07/16/07] CA Supr.:  Brodie-Welcher Cases!
  • [07/16/07] WCABImportant Ruling on Safety Officers' Apportionment
  • [07/23/07] WCAB:  Novel Approach Used for Skirting 2-Yr TD Cap

  • [07/23/07] WCAB:  Employer's Recon Petition on Decision Attacking New PDRS
  • [07/23/07] WCAB:  Is $10K Treatment Law Retroactive?
  • [07/23/07] 3rd Dist. CA:   Does Heart Presumption Apply to Horse Racing Investigator?

  • [07/23/07] 1st Dist. CA:  Opinion Certified on Paying TD After 5 Years
  • [07/30/07] WCAB:  When Does QME Panel Appointment Bind Applicant?
  • [07/30/07] 5th Dist. CA:  Does Recon Deadline Start to Run When Fraud Discovered?

  • [07/30/07] 4th Dist. CA:  Effect of WCAB Case on Retirement Board
  • [07/30/07] 2nd Dist. CA:  Res Judicata & Retirement Claims: Appeal or Forget It!

    August 2007

    -- IF CASE LINK DOESN'T WORK --

  • [08/06/07] 4th Dist. CA:   Review Standard for Disability Retirement Cases
  • [08/06/07] WCAB:  Read Decision Invalidating 2005 Rating Schedule
  • [08/06/07] 1st Dist. CA:   Is Delivery Driver 'Working' After Finishing Last Delivery?

  • [08/06/07] WCAB:  Figuring 2-Yr TD Cap: From When TD Due or When Paid?
  • [08/06/07] 1st Dist. CA:  Ruling on Baglioni & Pendergrass PDRS Issues
  • [08/13/07] 1st Dist. CA:   Brodie-Welcher Rulings Filtering Down

  • [08/20/07] 1st Dist. CA:  Court Reverses Another Case to Comply with Costco
  • [08/20/07] CA Supr.:   Another Case Reversed to Conform with Brodie
  • [08/20/07] 1st Dist. CA:   Case Certified Supporting Costco, Pendergrass

  • [08/20/07] 1st Dist. CA:   Court Reverses Another One on Costco/Chavez Grounds
  • [08/20/07] 3rd Dist. CA:  Another 'Old PDRS' Argument Bites the Dust
  • [08/20/07] 3rd Dist. CA:   No Employer Liability for Bad 2nd-Opinion Spinal Surgery

  • [08/27/07] 5th Dist. CA:   Infectious Disease Presumption in Cop's Death Case
  • [08/27/07] 2nd Dist. CA:   Court Gives CIGA Another Win (State Fund: Zero)
  • [08/27/07] 5th Dist. CA:   Watch Your Stips in 'Retroactive' P&S Report

    September 2007

    -- IF CASE LINK DOESN'T WORK --

  • [09/04/07] 4th Dist. CA:  VR Eligibility Letter Not Binding on Retirement Board
  • [09/04/07] 2nd Dist. CA:  Can Contractor Sue Employer for Safety Violation?
  • [09/04/07] 1st Dist. CA:  Can't Use ACOEM for Chronic Back

  • [09/04/07] WCAB:  Does Lien Holder Need Fictitious License?
  • [09/10/07] 5th Dist. CA:   Sewer Worker's Hepatitis C Found to be Work-Related
  • [09/10/07] 2nd Dist. CA:   Court Amends Typos (and Other Things) in CIGA Opinion

  • [09/10/07] 1st Dist. CA:   Costco Case Saves & Costs Employer
  • [09/10/07] 1st Dist. CA:   Does LC4642 Repeal Change Paying VR Outside Cap?
  • [09/10/07] 4th Dist. CA:   "Preliminary" PD Not Enough Without P&S for Old PDRS

  • [09/17/07] Sup.Ct.:   Hearing Denied in Mounted Deputy Horse-Shoe Case

    October 2007

    -- IF CASE LINK DOESN'T WORK --

  • [10/01/07] 1st Dist. CA:   WC Fraud Requires Specific Intent to Defraud
  • [10/08/07] 3rd Dist. CA:   No Assumption of Risk in Student v. School Relationship
  • [10/08/07] 4th Dist. CA:   Is Employee 'Working' If Driving Own Vehicle? Maybe...

  • [10/08/07] WCAB:  Board Defines 'Amputation' & How TD Cap Is Affected
  • [10/08/07] 5th Dist. CA:   Parties Can 'Stipulate Away' 90-Day Presumption
  • [10/08/07] 5th Dist. CA:   ACOEM Guides & 'May Be' Treatment Stips

  • [10/08/07] 4th Dist. CA:   When is 'Court Congestion' Defense to Subro S/L?
  • [10/08/07] 3rd Dist. CA:   No Heart Presumption for "Cop-Like" Duties Certified
  • [10/08/07] 1st Dist. CA:   Good Review of Cases Holding New PDRS Applies

  • [10/08/07] 6th Dist. CA:   'Oh My God, He's Gay' Comment Ruled Triable Issue
  • [10/22/07] 3rd Dist. CA:   Cases Reinforce Costco, Pendergrass on TD Duty to Notify
  • [10/22/07] 1st Dist. CA:   Worker Must Cooperate Before Filing FEHA Claim

  • [10/22/07] Sup.Ct.:   High Court Puts Burden on Employee in FEHA Case
  • [10/22/07] 5th Dist. CA:   Is Employee's 'Good Samaritan' Injury Compensable?

    November 2007

    -- IF CASE LINK DOESN'T WORK --

  • [11/13/07] Worker Wins Race Discrim Suit With Help of "Excuse Me" Comment
  • [11/13/07] 2nd Dist. CA:   Stores Have Limited Right to Prohibit Signature Gathering
  • [11/13/07] 5th Dist. CA:   Demotion is FEHA Violation, When to Award Attys Fees

  • [11/13/07] 4th Dist. CA:   Firefighter's CT Claim Untimely, Rating All Injuries Improper
  • [11/13/07] 6th Dist. CA:   Google Suit for Age Discrimination Allowed to Proceed
  • [11/19/07] 5th Dist. CA:   Court Denies Pro Per Applicant Right to File Late Appeal

  • [11/19/07] 5th Dist. CA:   Amending Pleading Allowed to Skirt Exclusive Remedy Rule
  • [11/19/07] 4th Dist. CA:   Liability Carrier Must Defend Employer in WC Death Case
  • [11/19/07] 6th Dist. CA:   Employee Belatedly Awarded Costs in Google Case

  • [11/19/07] 3rd Dist. CA:   Is Reporting Wage Loss Violations Triable Issue?
  • [11/19/07] 2nd Dist. CA:   Court Clarifies When Commercial Traveler Rule Won't Work
  • [11/19/07] 4th Dist. CA:   Worker's Attorney Fees in 3rd-Party Actions

  • [11/19/07] 4th Dist. CA:   "Preliminary" PD Report Case Now Certified
  • [11/26/07] 3rd Dist. CA:   TD End Date Determines If Old PDRS Applies
  • [11/26/07] 2nd Dist. CA:   Death Threats to Co-Workers Not Protected by FEHA

  • [11/26/07] 4th Dist. CA:   New PDRS Used When Not Ratable Under Old PDRS
  • [11/26/07] 3rd Dist. CA:   Published Opinion Throws Out 'Special' WC Fee Agreement

    December 2007

    -- IF CASE LINK DOESN'T WORK --

  • [12/03/07] 6th Dist. CA:   'Check-Box' Report Not 'Substantial Evidence'
  • [12/03/07] 1st Dist. CA:   WCAB Decision Reversed Without Summary of Evidence
  • [12/03/07] Sup.Ct.:   Supremes Allow Employer's WC-Claims Bonus Plan

  • [12/03/07] 6th Dist. CA:   Another '97 PDRS Case Bites the Dust
  • [12/10/07] Out-of- State Court Rules Med-Mal Cap Unconstitutional
  • [12/10/07] 5th Dist. CA:   Barbara Clark Gets Drop-Kicked by Appeals Court (Again)

  • [12/10/07] AARP, ACLU File Briefs Supporting Women, Older Workers
  • [12/10/07] 4th Dist. CA:   General Contractor Insulated From Liability by Court
  • [12/24/07] 3rd Dist. CA:   Violated Safety Order Ruled Neg. Per Se, $2.95 Mil Award

  • [12/31/07] Burned Worker Gets Largest Fed. Damages in Fresno History
  • [12/31/07] 2nd Dist. CA:   Retaliatory Theft Convictions Reversed for Pros. Misconduct
  • [12/31/07] 2nd Dist. CA:   School Immune for Privacy Invasion During WC Inquiry

  • [12/31/07] 4th Dist. CA:   Home Depot Overtime Cases Affirmed

    January 2008

  • [01-14-08] 5th Dist. CA:   Indust. Claim for Erectile Problems Peters Out
  • [01-14-08] 1st Dist. CA:   FEHA Doesn't Require Exhausting Admin. Remedies
  • [01-14-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   If Guardian Acts Like Nurse, Pay Like Nurse!

  • [01-21-08] Sup. Ct.:   Is Firing for Medical Marijuana Discrimination?
  • [01-28-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   'Special Employer' Doctrine Affirmed in Movie Studio Injury
  • [01-28-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Exhaust Labor Ruling Admin. Remedies Before Judicial Relief

  • [01-28-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   New 'Commercial Traveler Rule' Case Certified

    February 2008

  • [02-04-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Carrier Needn't Investigate If No WC Coverage
  • [02-04-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Vera Nixed?  Pre-2005 P&S Not Req'd
  • [02-04-08] 4th Dist. CA:   More Than Misrep Needed Before Canceling Health Ins.

  • [02-04-08] 4th Dist. CA:   'Bunkhouse Rule' Expanded
  • [02-04-08] WCAB: Board Sides With Interpreters
  • [02-04-08] 6th Dist. CA:   Certified Case Clarifies Old PDRS Exceptions

  • [02-04-08] 3rd Dist. CA:   New Age-Discrim. Case (Post Vaira)
  • [02-04-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Is Forced Return of Stock Labor Code Violation?
  • [02-11-08] 3rd Dist. CA:   Vaira Says No Age-Related Apportionmt

  • [02-11-08] 4th Dist. CA:   Recon Unit's 'Wrong' Address Excused in Late Filing
  • [02-18-08] 3rd Dist. CA:   Issue of Age-Related Apportionment Still Alive
  • [02-18-08] S.C.:   Supreme Court Rules on Firing for Med Pot Use

  • [02-25-08] 5th Dist. CA:   Is 104-Wk TD Cap Constitutional?
  • [02-25-08] Sup. Ct:  Hearing Ordered Despite Unverified Petition
  • [02-25-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Can More Than 1 Report Equal 1 'Med-Legal'?

  • [02-25-08] 1st Dist. CA:   Hearing Granted: Is 24-Visit Treatment Cap Legal?

    March 2008

  • [03-03-08] 3rd Dist. CA:   Court Won't Certify Vaira, Apport. Remains in Limbo
  • [03-03-08] 5th Dist. CA:   Is Temp, Non-Civil Service Worker Covered Under FEHA?
  • [03-03-08] 4th Dist. CA:   Employer Precluded From S/L Defense in Indemnity Case

  • [03-03-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Barring Worker's Experts Harmless Error in Ins. Fraud Case
  • [03-03-08] 4th Dist. CA:   Specific Intent Found, 2-Year WC Fraud Sentence Affirmed
  • [03-10-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Ambul. Driver 'Health Care Provider' - Major Ramifications!

  • [03-10-08] 4th Dist. CA:   When Is Labor Arbitration Clause Adhesion Contract?
  • [03-10-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Exhausting FEHA Remedies Jurisdictional, not Procedural
  • [03-10-08] 1st Dist. CA:   NLRA Trumps State Wrongful Termination Suit

  • [03-10-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   $275K Attys Fees Awarded to Employer in WC Bonus Case
  • [03-17-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Fee Award Affirmed in Overtime Pay Case (But Not Much)
  • [03-17-08] WCAB:   Discovery Ok'd in WC Class Action, Appeal Expected

  • [03-17-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   No FEHA Violation If No Evidence of Job Available
  • [03-17-08] 3rd Dist. CA:   Even if Treatment May Offer Temp Relief, Doctor Disciplined
  • [03-17-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Small FEHA Verdict Doesn't Justify Disallowing Large Fees

  • [03-24-08] 3rd Dist. CA:   Is Psyche 'Harassment' Objective or Subjective?
  • [03-24-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   If Doc Says TTD, 'Could' Return to Work Is Irrelevant!
  • [03-24-08] 3rd Dist. CA:   Med Arbitration Notice Must Be 'Prominently' Displayed

  • [03-24-08] 4th Dist. CA:   Adhesion-like Arb. Clause No Good in FEHA Case
  • [03-24-08] 1st Dist. CA:   Can Labor Code Bar Firing for Federal Public Policy?
  • [03-24-08] 1st Dist. CA:   Big Players File Briefs in "Anti"- Wilkinson Case

  • [03-24-08] US/SC:  Fed Arbitration Act Trumps CA Labor Law (Sometimes)
  • [03-24-08] 5th Dist. CA:   Misdemeanor WC Fraud Conviction No Bar to WC Benefits
  • [03-24-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Court Cites Brodie as It Decimates 100% Case

  • [03-31-08] 5th Dist. CA:   Can Employer Deny Med Award After Paying for Years?

    April 2008

  • [04-07-08] 4th Dist. CA:   Large (Rare) Fee Accessed Against Employee in FEHA Case
  • [04-07-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   3-Prong Fed Civil Rights Test OK'd for FEHA Claims
  • [04-07-08] 1st Dist. CA:   Is It Conflict Per Se If Firm Reps, Then Sues, Carrier?

  • [04-07-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Beware:   'Modified' Fee Agreements May Be Worthless
  • [04-14-08] 5th Dist. CA:   No Duty Owed to Farm Worker Injured on Private Road
  • [04-14-08] 1st Dist. CA:  Hearing Set on Legality of 24-Visit Chiro Cap

  • [04-14-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Dueling DCA's: Vera vs. Genlyte (PD Without P&S?)
  • [04-14-08] 1st Dist. CA:   Can Carrier Decide "Special Employee" Status?
  • [04-14-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Court Rules Punitives OK in FEHA Case If Fired for Hiring Atty

  • [04-14-08] 4th Dist. CA:   "Unfair" Termination Not "Wrongful" Termination
  • [04-14-08] Supr. Ct.:   Can Individual Be Liable for FEHA Retaliation?
  • [04-14-08] 1st Dist. CA:   TSA Employee Can't Sue Airline for Heavy Bag Injury

  • [04-21-08] 1st Dist. CA:   Court May Review Opinion Ending Wilkinson Rule
  • [04-21-08] 6th Dist. CA:   Appointed Counsel Doesn't Fight WC Fraud Conviction
  • [04-28-08] 1st Dist. CA:   $700K Asbestos Verdict Against Exxon Mobil Affirmed

  • [04-28-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Despite Dismissal of WC Fraud, 10-Yr Sentence Affirmed
  • [04-28-08] 1st Dist. CA:   Court Affirms $10M+ in Punitives in Asbestos Case
  • [04-28-08] 1st Dist. CA:   Wrongful Term. Arbitration Clause Voided If Loser Pays Costs

    May 2008

  • [05-05-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Are Newspaper Carriers "Employees"?
  • [05-05-08] 5th Dist. CA:   How Not to Handle an Atty Fee Arbitration Dispute
  • [05-05-08] S.C.-2nd Dist. CA:   Does Failure to Post Notice Toll St/Limitations?

  • [05-05-08] 1st Dist. CA:   Owners of Corp Not Personally Liable for Unpaid Wages
  • [05-05-08] Supr. Ct:   Employers Given Room for Arguing Medical Leave
  • [05-12-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Widow Denied Life Ins. Based on WC Collateral Estoppel

  • [05-12-08] 1st Dist. CA:   Palm Medical's Jury Verdict Reinstated Against SCIF
  • [05-19-08] 4th Dist. CA:   Employee's Assault on Customer Within Scope of Duties?
  • [05-19-08] 6th Dist. CA:   Failure to Argue Due Process Bars Appeal

  • [05-19-08] US Supr.:   Is It Conflict If Carrier Decides Disability Eligibility?
  • [05-19-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   C&R Release Used Against Employee in Civil Action
  • [05-19-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Fired Public Employee Can't Sue on Contract Theory

  • [05-19-08] 4th Dist. CA:   Case Tossing Arbitration in FEHA Discrim Dispute Certified

    June 2008

  • [06-02-08] 5th Dist. CA:   Another Blow for Workers' TD - This Time State Employees
  • [06-02-08] 1st Dist. CA:   Another DCA Takes Sides on P&S vs. PD Conflict
  • [06-02-08] 4th Dist. CA:   How Long Does Retired Firefighter Have to File Claim?

  • [06-02-08] 4th Dist. CA:   Cost-Sharing Arbitration Clause Unconstitutional
  • [06-02-08] 4th Dist. CA:   Exclusive Remedy Rules Doesn't Preclude Defamation Action
  • [06-16-08] 1st Dist. CA:   1st Case on 'Kin Care Leave' Liberally Construes for Worker

  • [06-16-08] Supr.Ct.:   Review Granted on Stock Option Plan & LC 201/2
  • [06-16-08] 5th Dist. CA:   Corporate Veil Pierced in Failure to Provide WC Insurance
  • [06-16-08] 1st Dist. CA:   Past 'Good' Conduct Doesn't Negate Discrimination

  • [06-16-08] 5th Dist. CA:   Court Affirms Lack of Evidence in Valley Fever Case
  • [06-16-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   No Liability for "Commuting" Seaman's West Nile Disease
  • [06-23-08] 5th Dist. CA:   14-Yr WC Litigator Ordered to Pay Atty Fees

  • [06-23-08] 3rd Dist. CA:   LC 5803 Gives WCAB Right to Change PDRS Recon Ruling
  • [06-23-08] 3rd Dist. CA:   104-Week TD Cap Strictly Interpreted for Separate Injuries
  • [06-23-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Vacationing SWAT Officer Covered for 'Training' Injury

  • [06-23-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Court Denies Class Action Status Against SCIF
  • [06-30-08] WCAB:   Panel Presents Interesting Treatment-Outside-MPN Issue
  • [06-30-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Newspaper Deliverer as 'Employee' Case Now Certified

  • [06-30-08] 3rd Dist. CA:   New Discrimination Concept?   "Retaliation Before-the-Fact"?
  • [06-30-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Court Voids Ruling Awarding TD After 5 Years
  • [06-30-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   11-Year Delay of Claim Form Tolls Statute of Limitations

    July 2008

  • [07-14-08] US/9:   Employee Drug Test Violates 4th Amendment
  • [07-14-08] S.C.:   U.S. Supremes Give Workers (Retaliatory) Break
  • [07-14-08] 1st Dist. CA:   Review Granted on What Constitutes "TD" for Cap

  • [07-14-08] 4th Dist. CA:   Arbitration Clause Ruled Adhesive, Void
  • [07-14-08] US 9th:   Can Employers Read ALL Email and Texts?   Not Always!
  • [07-14-08] 3rd Dist. CA:   Judgment Ok Even W/O Statement of Decision

  • [07-21-08] 3rd Dist. CA:   "Ultimate" Sanctions Awarded to Liberty Mutual
  • [07-21-08] 5th Dist. CA:   Is Special Industrial Leave Part of TD Cap?
  • [07-21-08] CA Sup. Ct.:   State Fund's Palm Medical Appeal Rejected

  • [07-21-08] 1st Dist. CA:   Benson Case (Voiding Wilkinson) Granted Review

    August 2008

  • [08-04-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Court OK's Huge Def Fees in Premier Medical Case
  • [08-04-08] 4th Dist. CA:   Disability Claimant Must Exhaust Admin Remedies
  • [08-04-08] WCAB:   Does Surgery Center Need Fict. Name, Med License?

  • [08-04-08] 5th Dist. CA:   Must Look to Pre-2005 Reports Only for Old PDRS
  • [08-04-08] 4th Dist. CA:   Employee Didn't Prove Termination, Can't Sue for Distress
  • [08-04-08] 3rd Dist. CA:   WCJ Used Wrong Test for Which PDRS to Use

  • [08-04-08] 5th Dist. CA:   Case Remanded to Determine How P&S Date Was Decided
  • [08-04-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   'Specifically Authorized' Power Press Guard Removal
  • [08-11-08] WCAB:   Sweeping Elite Surgery Case Reversed

  • [08-11-08] 3rd Dist. CA:   Writ Granted: Return Atty Fees If Award Reduced?
  • [08-11-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Oral Referral Fee OK... If You Can Prove It!
  • [08-11-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   No Prima Facie Needed If Direct Gender Bias Evidence

  • [08-11-08] US/9:   Damages for Emotional Distress Under FMLA Clarified
  • [08-18-08] Sup.Ct:   Sandhagen Overturned!  Employers Get UR, Not 4062
  • [08-18-08] 1st Dist. CA:   Charter Counties Exempt From Overtime & Meal Rules

  • [08-18-08] 1st Dist. CA:   24-Visit Chiro Cap Declared Valid
  • [08-18-08] 3rd Dist. CA:   Attempts Past Exclusive Remedy Rule Fail
  • [08-18-08] WCAB:   2005 PDRS Affirmed in Boughner

  • [08-18-08] Supr. Ct:   Public Policy Firings, Emotional Distress & Whistle Blowers
  • [08-18-08] WCAB:   En Banc:   Can "Defrocked" Atty Be WCAB 'Rep'?
  • [08-18-08] 5th Dist. CA:   Negligent Rep of Employer Case: Sanctions Awarded

  • [08-18-08] 4th Dist. CA:   Meal & Break Class Lawsuits Weakened
  • [08-25-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Triable FEHA Issues & Public Policy

    September 2008

  • [09-02-08] 1st Dist. CA:   Sufficient Notice for Worker Arbitration
  • [09-02-08] 1st Dist. CA:   Arbitrating Job Claims When Personal Torts Involved
  • [09-02-08] 1st Dist. CA:   General Contractor's Duty of Care

  • [09-02-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Deputies' Vacation Pay Ruled 132a Violation
  • [09-08-08] Supr. Ct:   Review Denied in SWAT Officer's Vacation Injury
  • [09-15-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Arbitration Agreement Valid Despite Procedural Defects

  • [09-15-08] Supr. Ct:   Med Treatment & Religious Beliefs
  • [09-15-08] Supr. Ct:   Homeowner Liable Per Se for Unlicensed Worker?
  • [09-22-08] 4th Dist. CA:  No Reversal for Arbitrator's Failure to Disclose

  • [09-22-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Delegating Worksite Safety, Is Safety Breach Neg. Per Se?
  • [09-22-08] Supr. Ct:   Supremes to Rule on Med Denials & Atty Fees
  • [09-22-08] 5th Dist. CA:   Deceased Worker Ruled 'Partner' -- No Death Benefits

  • [09-22-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Unlicensed Ind. Contr. Estopped From Employee Status
  • [09-22-08] 4th Dist. CA:   'Custom' or 'Policy' Needed for Retaliatory Claim
  • [09-22-08] 4th Dist. CA:   Gay Minister's Claims Barred By 'Ministerial' Rule

  • [09-29-08] 5th Dist. CA:   Looking Beyond 2005 Med Report OK for Pre-2005 PD

    October 2008

  • [10-06-08] 5th Dist. CA:   Brooks Says 2-Yr TD Cap Applies to State Workers' Ind. Pay
  • [10-06-08] 1st Dist. CA:   Employer Liable for Worker Despite Driving Home
  • [10-06-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   School's Fails to Accommodate, 900K+ Fees & Damages

  • [10-06-08] 3rd Dist. CA:   Retroactivity of Safety Officers Apportionmt Rules
  • [10-06-08] 5th Dist. CA:   Burden of Proving Apportionment and Overlap
  • [10-20-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Employer Not Req'd to Create Part Time Job

  • [10-27-08] 3rd Dist. CA:   Who Pays for Voc Rehab Report?
  • [10-27-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   VRMA Not 'Wage-Replacement' -- No Employer Credit
  • [10-27-08] 1st Dist. CA:   3rd Party Dismissal No Bar to Subrogation Action

  • [10-27-08] 9th Circuit Upholds San Francisco's Employer Health Care Law
  • [10-27-08] 1st Dist. CA:   App. Atty Gets Priority Over Employer on Lien

    November 2008

  • [11-03-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Can Future Wages Be Credited Against VRMA?
  • [11-03-08] 5th Dist. CA:   Old PDRS Applies Even If New '05 TD
  • [11-03-08] Supr.Ct:   Review Denied in Case Upholding 24-Visit Chiro Cap

  • [11-03-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Minimum Wage Case Denied Class Action Status
  • [11-03-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Anti-SLAPP Motion Protects WC Adjuster
  • [11-10-08] WCAB (en banc):   Med Liens & Burden of Proof

  • [11-10-08] 1st Dist. CA:   TD Cap and Injured Teachers
  • [11-10-08] 4th Dist. CA:   Dual Employment Relationship Explained
  • [11-10-08] 5th Dist. CA:   Vera Ignored, Old PDRS Applies Under Gentyle

  • [11-10-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Is Overtime Due for 'Exempt' AND 'Nonexempt' Duties?
  • [11-17-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Personnel Action May Be Discrim., Not Emotional Distress
  • [11-17-08] Huge Attys Fees Ordered From SCIF in Palm Medical Case

  • [11-17-08] 4th Dist. CA:   When Same Policy Covers Employer's Liability Ins. & WC
  • [11-17-08] Key Panel Decisions
  • [11-17-08] 1st Dist. CA:   Foot Locker Employee Class Settlement Set Aside

  • [11-17-08] Sup.Ct:   'Equitable' Tolling of FEHA Stat./Limitations

    December 2008

  • [12-01-08] Sup.Ct:   Future of Benson Cloudy
  • [12-01-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   "Other Ins." Policy Not Needed to Dismiss CIGA
  • [12-01-08] 5th Dist. CA:   WCJ's Admitted Math Error Too Late to Change

  • [12-01-08] US/6:   RICO Case on WC Denials Proceeds
  • [12-01-08] Sup.Ct:   Uncitable Case Used to Enforce Labor Rules?
  • [12-08-08] 5th Dist. CA:   Pre-Brodie Dykes Case Reopened, Reduced

  • [12-08-08] 5th Dist. CA:   Cop's Cancer Presumption Not Supported by Evidence
  • [12-08-08] 3rd Dist. CA:   C&R PDA Credits: Watch Your Language
  • [12-08-08] 5th Dist. CA:   WCJ Isn't Bound By His Earlier Ruling of "Possible" Injury

  • [12-08-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Similar Acts of Job Discrim Can Toll S/L
  • [12-08-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   Asbestos Case Reversed, No "Consumer" Instruction

  • [12-22-08] 4th Dist. CA:   No Punitives for Meal & Rest Violations
  • [12-22-08] 6th Dist. CA:   Being Bad Manager Doesn't Violate FEHA
  • [12-22-08] 3rd Dist. CA:   Court Sides With Genlyte on Old Rating Without P&S

  • [12-22-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   What Constitutes 'Notice' to Fire Police Officer?
  • [12-22-08] 2nd Dist. CA:   'Substantial Evidence' for Firing Drug-Positive Cop
  • [12-29-08] 5th Dist. CA:   Lien for Life Care Plan Denied

  • [12-29-08] 1st Dist. CA:   Split on When PI Suit Against Gen. Contr. Permitted
  • [12-29-08] 1st Dist. CA:   Trial Court Powerless in Arbitration Hearing
  • [12-29-08] 4th Dist. CA:   Admitting Prior Comp Claims in PI Case Harmless

  • [12-29-08] WCAB (en banc):   LC 5814 Penalties & Attorneys Fees
  • [12-29-08] 1st Dist. CA:   Oral Arguments Conclude in Benson Appeal
  • [12-29-08] 4th Dist. CA:   No Standing to Complain of Pot Questions on Job App.


  •  

     


    Return to Top of Page

    Go to Alphabetical Case Index

      Contact Us | About WorkInjury.com | Legal
     © 2004-2009 Goldberger & Associates       All rights reserved.       Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Accessibility